Alright, #6170 shipped. @alessandrogario if you get a chance can you rebase #6197 and see if it passes tests? I'll see if I can rebase #6044 somehow without ted.

Done rebasing! will keep an eye on the tests

Do you think it's worth having an explicit test case for this? Maybe I can check if removing your code causes tests to fail? That'd be super hot 🙂

If there is any test catching that, we'll see the error now on master

OH shit, that's right!

Teddy's PR was fixing a couple of things to make initialization more structured